Export limit exceeded: 333404 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (333404 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-13220 | 1 Pragmasoftwares | 1 Google Map Professional | 2025-05-12 | 6.1 Medium |
| The WordPress Google Map Professional (Map In Your Language) WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not sanitise and escape a parameter before outputting it back in the page, leading to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting which could be used against high privilege users such as admin. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13221 | 1 Parisholley | 1 Fantastic Elasticsearch | 2025-05-12 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Fantastic ElasticSearch WordPress plugin through 4.1.0 does not sanitise and escape a parameter before outputting it back in the page, leading to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting which could be used against high privilege users such as admin. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13223 | 1 Samwilson | 1 Tabulate | 2025-05-12 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Tabulate WordPress plugin through 2.10.3 does not sanitise and escape some parameters before outputting them back in the page, leading to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting which could be used against high privilege users such as admin. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13224 | 1 Dtelepathy | 1 Slidedeck 1 Lite Content Slider | 2025-05-12 | 6.1 Medium |
| The SlideDeck 1 Lite Content Slider WordPress plugin through 1.4.8 does not sanitise and escape a parameter before outputting it back in the page, leading to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting which could be used against high privilege users such as admin. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13112 | 1 Phd38 | 1 Wp Mediatagger | 2025-05-11 | 6.1 Medium |
| The WP MediaTagger WordPress plugin through 4.1.1 does not sanitise and escape a parameter before outputting it back in the page, leading to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting which could be used against high privilege users such as admin. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13101 | 1 Phd38 | 1 Wp Mediatagger | 2025-05-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| The WP MediaTagger WordPress plugin through 4.1.1 does not validate and escape some of its shortcode attributes before outputting them back in a page/post where the shortcode is embed, which could allow users with the contributor role and above to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12709 | 1 Ombu | 1 Bulk Me Now\! | 2025-05-11 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Bulk Me Now! WordPress plugin through 2.0 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12708 | 1 Ombu | 1 Bulk Me Now\! | 2025-05-11 | 7.1 High |
| The Bulk Me Now! WordPress plugin through 2.0 does not validate and escape some of its shortcode attributes before outputting them back in a page/post where the shortcode is embed, which could allow users with the contributor role and above to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12638 | 1 Ombu | 1 Bulk Me Now\! | 2025-05-11 | 7.1 High |
| The Bulk Me Now! WordPress plugin through 2.0 does not sanitise and escape a parameter before outputting it back in the page, leading to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting which could be used against high privilege users such as admin. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10309 | 1 Data443 | 1 Tracking Code Manager | 2025-05-11 | 5.9 Medium |
| The Tracking Code Manager WordPress plugin before 2.4.0 does not sanitise and escape some of its metabox settings when outputing them in the page, which could allow users with a role as low as Contributor to perform Cross-Site Scripting attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12749 | 1 Raiserweb | 1 Competition Form | 2025-05-11 | 7.1 High |
| The Competition Form WordPress plugin through 2.0 does not sanitise and escape a parameter before outputting it back in the page, leading to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting which could be used against high privilege users such as admin. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12807 | 1 Artlosk | 1 Social Share Buttons | 2025-05-11 | 4.8 Medium |
| The Social Share Buttons for WordPress plugin through 2.7 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup). | ||||
| CVE-2025-31191 | 1 Apple | 4 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 1 more | 2025-05-10 | 5.5 Medium |
| This issue was addressed through improved state management. This issue is fixed in macOS Ventura 13.7.5, tvOS 18.4, iOS 18.4 and iPadOS 18.4, macOS Sequoia 15.4, macOS Sonoma 14.7.5. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. | ||||
| CVE-2025-21872 | 2025-05-10 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: efi: Don't map the entire mokvar table to determine its size Currently, when validating the mokvar table, we (re)map the entire table on each iteration of the loop, adding space as we discover new entries. If the table grows over a certain size, this fails due to limitations of early_memmap(), and we get a failure and traceback: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at mm/early_ioremap.c:139 __early_ioremap+0xef/0x220 ... Call Trace: <TASK> ? __early_ioremap+0xef/0x220 ? __warn.cold+0x93/0xfa ? __early_ioremap+0xef/0x220 ? report_bug+0xff/0x140 ? early_fixup_exception+0x5d/0xb0 ? early_idt_handler_common+0x2f/0x3a ? __early_ioremap+0xef/0x220 ? efi_mokvar_table_init+0xce/0x1d0 ? setup_arch+0x864/0xc10 ? start_kernel+0x6b/0xa10 ? x86_64_start_reservations+0x24/0x30 ? x86_64_start_kernel+0xed/0xf0 ? common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141 </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- mokvar: Failed to map EFI MOKvar config table pa=0x7c4c3000, size=265187. Mapping the entire structure isn't actually necessary, as we don't ever need more than one entry header mapped at once. Changes efi_mokvar_table_init() to only map each entry header, not the entire table, when determining the table size. Since we're not mapping any data past the variable name, it also changes the code to enforce that each variable name is NUL terminated, rather than attempting to verify it in place. | ||||
| CVE-2025-21832 | 2025-05-10 | 4.4 Medium | ||
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block: don't revert iter for -EIOCBQUEUED blkdev_read_iter() has a few odd checks, like gating the position and count adjustment on whether or not the result is bigger-than-or-equal to zero (where bigger than makes more sense), and not checking the return value of blkdev_direct_IO() before doing an iov_iter_revert(). The latter can lead to attempting to revert with a negative value, which when passed to iov_iter_revert() as an unsigned value will lead to throwing a WARN_ON() because unroll is bigger than MAX_RW_COUNT. Be sane and don't revert for -EIOCBQUEUED, like what is done in other spots. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39501 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2025-05-10 | 4.7 Medium |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2023-53063 | 2025-05-10 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2022-48917 | 2025-05-10 | 5.0 Medium | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2025-37835 | 2025-05-10 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2025-37795 | 2025-05-10 | 7.1 High | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||