Export limit exceeded: 330706 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (330706 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-49784 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzer-bigdata | 2026-03-11 | 5.6 Medium |
| An improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.2 all versions, FortiAnalyzer 7.0 all versions, FortiAnalyzer 6.4 all versions, FortiAnalyzer-BigData 7.6.0, FortiAnalyzer-BigData 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, FortiAnalyzer-BigData 7.2 all versions, FortiAnalyzer-BigData 7.0 all versions, FortiAnalyzer-BigData 6.4 all versions, FortiAnalyzer-BigData 6.2 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2025-68482 | 1 Fortinet | 6 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzer Cloud, Fortianalyzercloud and 3 more | 2026-03-11 | 6.3 Medium |
| A improper certificate validation vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiAnalyzer 7.2 all versions, FortiAnalyzer 7.0 all versions, FortiAnalyzer 6.4 all versions, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiManager 7.2 all versions, FortiManager 7.0 all versions, FortiManager 6.4 all versions may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to view confidential information via a man in the middle [MiTM] attack. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22629 | 1 Fortinet | 6 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzer Cloud, Fortianalyzercloud and 3 more | 2026-03-11 | 3.4 Low |
| An improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiAnalyzer 7.4 all versions, FortiAnalyzer 7.2 all versions, FortiAnalyzer 7.0 all versions, FortiAnalyzer 6.4 all versions, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.2, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.10, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.0.1 through 7.0.14, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 6.4 all versions, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiManager 7.4 all versions, FortiManager 7.2 all versions, FortiManager 7.0 all versions, FortiManager 6.4 all versions, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.2 through 7.6.3, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.10, FortiManager Cloud 7.0.1 through 7.0.14, FortiManager Cloud 6.4 all versions may allow an attacker to bypass bruteforce protections via exploitation of race conditions. The latter raises the complexity of practical exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25972 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisiem | 2026-03-11 | 4.1 Medium |
| An improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSIEM 7.4.0, FortiSIEM 7.3.0 through 7.3.4 may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to provide arbitrary data enabling a social engineering attack via spoofed URL parameters. | ||||
| CVE-2026-24017 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiweb | 2026-03-11 | 7.3 High |
| An Improper Control of Interaction Frequency vulnerability [CWE-799] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.2, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.5, FortiWeb 7.4.0 through 7.4.10, FortiWeb 7.2.0 through 7.2.11, FortiWeb 7.0.0 through 7.0.11 may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to bypass the authentication rate-limit via crafted requests. The success of the attack depends on the attacker's resources and the password target complexity. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54659 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisoaragentcommunicationbridge | 2026-03-11 | 5.5 Medium |
| An Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability [CWE-22] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSOAR Agent Communication Bridge 1.1.0, FortiSOAR Agent Communication Bridge 1.0 all versions may allow an unauthenticated attacker to read files accessible to the fortisoar user on a system where the agent is deployed, via sending a crafted request to the agent port. | ||||
| CVE-2026-24640 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiweb | 2026-03-11 | 5.9 Medium |
| A Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability [CWE-121] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.2, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiWeb 7.4 all versions, FortiWeb 7.2 all versions, FortiWeb 7.0.2 through 7.0.12 may allow a remote authenticated attacker who can bypass stack protection and ASLR to execute arbitrary code or commands via crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-24641 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiweb | 2026-03-11 | 2.5 Low |
| A NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability [CWE-476] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.2, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiWeb 7.4 all versions, FortiWeb 7.2 all versions, FortiWeb 7.0 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to crash the HTTP daemon via crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66178 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiweb | 2026-03-11 | 6.7 Medium |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.5, FortiWeb 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiWeb 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiWeb 7.0.0 through 7.0.12 may allow an authenticated attacked to execute arbitrary commands via a specialy crafted HTTP request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30944 | 1 Withstudiocms | 1 Studiocms | 2026-03-11 | 8.8 High |
| StudioCMS is a server-side-rendered, Astro native, headless content management system. Prior to 0.4.0, the /studiocms_api/dashboard/api-tokens endpoint allows any authenticated user (at least Editor) to generate API tokens for any other user, including owner and admin accounts. The endpoint fails to validate whether the requesting user is authorized to create tokens on behalf of the target user ID, resulting in a full privilege escalation. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.4.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30945 | 1 Withstudiocms | 1 Studiocms | 2026-03-11 | 7.1 High |
| StudioCMS is a server-side-rendered, Astro native, headless content management system. Prior to 0.4.0, the DELETE /studiocms_api/dashboard/api-tokens endpoint allows any authenticated user with editor privileges or above to revoke API tokens belonging to any other user, including admin and owner accounts. The handler accepts tokenID and userID directly from the request payload without verifying token ownership, caller identity, or role hierarchy. This enables targeted denial of service against critical integrations and automations. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.4.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30956 | 1 Oneuptime | 1 Oneuptime | 2026-03-11 | 10 Critical |
| OneUptime is a solution for monitoring and managing online services. Prior to 10.0.21, a low‑privileged user can bypass authorization and tenant isolation in OneUptime v10.0.20 and earlier by sending a forged is-multi-tenant-query header together with a controlled projectid header. Because the server trusts this client-supplied header, internal permission checks in BasePermission are skipped and tenant scoping is disabled. This allows attackers to access project data belonging to other tenants, read sensitive User fields via nested relations, leak plaintext resetPasswordToken, and reset the victim’s password and fully take over the account. This results in cross‑tenant data exposure and full account takeover. This vulnerability is fixed in 10.0.21. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30957 | 1 Oneuptime | 1 Oneuptime | 2026-03-11 | 10 Critical |
| OneUptime is a solution for monitoring and managing online services. Prior to 10.0.21, OneUptime Synthetic Monitors allow a low-privileged authenticated project user to execute arbitrary commands on the oneuptime-probe server/container. The root cause is that untrusted Synthetic Monitor code is executed inside Node's vm while live host-realm Playwright browser and page objects are exposed to it. A malicious user can call Playwright APIs on the injected browser object and cause the probe to spawn an attacker-controlled executable. This is a server-side remote code execution issue. It does not require a separate vm sandbox escape. This vulnerability is fixed in 10.0.21. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30958 | 1 Oneuptime | 1 Oneuptime | 2026-03-11 | 7.2 High |
| OneUptime is a solution for monitoring and managing online services. Prior to 10.0.21, an unauthenticated path traversal in the /workflow/docs/:componentName endpoint allows reading arbitrary files from the server filesystem. The componentName route parameter is concatenated directly into a file path passed to res.sendFile() in orker/FeatureSet/Workflow/Index.ts with no sanitization or authentication middleware. This vulnerability is fixed in 10.0.21. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27259 | 1 Adobe | 1 Adobe Experience Manager | 2026-03-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13901 | 1 Schneider-electric | 2 Modicon M241/m251, Modicon M262 | 2026-03-11 | N/A |
| CWE-404 Improper Resource Shutdown or Release vulnerability exists that could cause partial Denial of Service on Machine Expert protocol when an unauthenticated attacker sends malicious payload to occupy active communication channels. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13902 | 1 Schneider-electric | 2 Modicon Controllers M241/m251, Modicon Controllers M258/lmc058 | 2026-03-11 | N/A |
| CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability exists that could cause condition where authenticated attackers can have a victim’s browser run arbitrary JavaScript when the victim hovers over a maliciously crafted element on a web server containing the injected payload. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30959 | 1 Oneuptime | 1 Oneuptime | 2026-03-11 | N/A |
| OneUptime is a solution for monitoring and managing online services. The resend-verification-code endpoint allows any authenticated user to trigger a verification code resend for any UserWhatsApp record by ID. Ownership is not validated (unlike the verify endpoint). This affects the UserWhatsAppAPI.ts endpoint and the UserWhatsAppService.ts service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1286 | 1 Schneider-electric | 1 Foxboro Dcs | 2026-03-11 | N/A |
| CWE-502: Deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability exists that could lead to loss of confidentiality, integrity and potential remote code execution on workstation when an admin authenticated user opens a malicious project file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30960 | 1 Apich-organization | 1 Rssn | 2026-03-11 | N/A |
| rssn is a scientific computing library for Rust, combining a high-performance symbolic computation engine with numerical methods support and physics simulations functionalities. The vulnerability exists in the JIT (Just-In-Time) compilation engine, which is fully exposed via the CFFI (Foreign Function Interface). Due to Improper Input Validation and External Control of Code Generation, an attacker can supply malicious parameters or instruction sequences through the CFFI layer. Since the library often operates with elevated privileges or within high-performance computing contexts, this allows for Arbitrary Code Execution (ACE) at the privilege level of the host process. | ||||