Export limit exceeded: 331317 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (331317 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-41662 | 2025-07-23 | N/A | ||
| CVE-2025-41662 is considered redundant or unnecessary and thus should be withdrawn. Instead, a new CVE CVE-2025-41687 has been reserved to better reflect the updated analysis. | ||||
| CVE-2024-34517 | 1 Neo4j | 1 Neo4j | 2025-07-23 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Cypher component in Neo4j 5.0.0 through 5.18 mishandles IMMUTABLE privileges in some situations where an attacker already has admin access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32919 | 1 Google | 2 Android, Pixel | 2025-07-22 | 7.8 High |
| In lwis_add_completion_fence of lwis_fence.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to type confusion. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32921 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-07-22 | 7.4 High |
| In lwis_initialize_transaction_fences of lwis_fence.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32922 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-07-22 | 7.4 High |
| In gpu_pm_power_on_top_nolock of pixel_gpu_power.c, there is a possible compromise of protected memory due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege to TEE with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32923 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-07-22 | 4 Medium |
| there is a possible cellular denial of service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32924 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-07-22 | 7.5 High |
| In DeregAcceptProcINT of cn_NrmmStateDeregInit.cpp, there is a possible denial of service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32925 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-07-22 | 8.8 High |
| In dhd_prot_txstatus_process of dhd_msgbuf.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32926 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-07-22 | 5.5 Medium |
| there is a possible information disclosure due to side channel information disclosure. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32929 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-07-22 | 8.1 High |
| In gpu_slc_get_region of pixel_gpu_slc.c, there is a possible EoP due to a use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32930 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-07-22 | 5.5 Medium |
| In plugin_ipc_handler of slc_plugin.c, there is a possible information disclosure due to uninitialized data. This could lead to local information disclosure of 4 bytes of stack memory with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-47053 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2025-07-22 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier are affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. A low privileged attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a specially crafted web page. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46959 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2025-07-22 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier are affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. A low privileged attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a specially crafted web page. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32920 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-07-22 | 7.1 High |
| In set_secure_reg of sac_handler.c, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure of 4 bytes of stack memory with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24470 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiportal | 2025-07-22 | 8.1 High |
| An Improper Resolution of Path Equivalence vulnerability [CWE-41] in FortiPortal 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.6, 7.0.0 through 7.0.11 may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to retrieve source code via crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2024-52966 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortianalyzer | 2025-07-22 | 2.2 Low |
| An exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 6.4.0 through 7.6.0 allows attacker to cause information disclosure via filter manipulation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-40584 | 1 Fortinet | 5 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzer Big Data, Fortianalyzer Cloud and 2 more | 2025-07-22 | 6.8 Medium |
| An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability [CWE-78] in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer version 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, 7.2.0 through 7.2.5, 7.0.0 through 7.0.13, 6.4.0 through 6.4.15 and 6.2.2 through 6.2.13, Fortinet FortiManager version 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, 7.2.0 through 7.2.5, 7.0.0 through 7.0.13, 6.4.0 through 6.4.15 and 6.2.2 through 6.2.13, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer BigData version 7.4.0, 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, 7.0.1 through 7.0.6, 6.4.5 through 6.4.7 and 6.2.5, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer Cloud version 7.4.1 through 7.4.3, 7.2.1 through 7.2.5, 7.0.1 through 7.0.13 and 6.4.1 through 6.4.7 and Fortinet FortiManager Cloud version 7.4.1 through 7.4.3, 7.2.1 through 7.2.5, 7.0.1 through 7.0.13 and 6.4.1 through 6.4.7 GUI allows an authenticated privileged attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted HTTPS or HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2024-46666 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortios | 2025-07-22 | 4.8 Medium |
| An allocation of resources without limits or throttling [CWE-770] vulnerability in FortiOS versions 7.6.0, versions 7.4.4 through 7.4.0, 7.2 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 6.4 all versions may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to prevent access to the GUI via specially crafted requests directed at specific endpoints. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36504 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortios | 2025-07-22 | 6.2 Medium |
| An out-of-bounds read vulnerability [CWE-125] in FortiOS SSLVPN web portal versions 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, versions 7.2.0 through 7.2.8, 7.0 all verisons, and 6.4 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to perform a denial of service on the SSLVPN web portal via a specially crafted URL. | ||||
| CVE-2023-37931 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortivoice | 2025-07-22 | 8.6 High |
| An improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') vulnerability [CWE-88] in FortiVoice Entreprise version 7.0.0 through 7.0.1 and before 6.4.8 allows an authenticated attacker to perform a blind sql injection attack via sending crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests | ||||