Export limit exceeded: 336904 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (336904 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-1993 | 2 Smub, Wordpress | 2 Exactmetrics – Google Analytics Dashboard For Wordpress (website Stats Plugin), Wordpress | 2026-03-20 | 8.8 High |
| The ExactMetrics – Google Analytics Dashboard for WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Improper Privilege Management in versions 7.1.0 through 9.0.2. This is due to the `update_settings()` function accepting arbitrary plugin setting names without a whitelist of allowed settings. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with the `exactmetrics_save_settings` capability to modify any plugin setting, including the `save_settings` option that controls which user roles have access to plugin functionality. The admin intended to delegate configuration access to a trusted user, not enable that user to delegate access to everyone. By setting `save_settings` to include `subscriber`, an attacker can grant plugin administrative access to all subscribers on the site. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1992 | 2 Smub, Wordpress | 2 Exactmetrics – Google Analytics Dashboard For Wordpress (website Stats Plugin), Wordpress | 2026-03-20 | 8.8 High |
| The ExactMetrics – Google Analytics Dashboard for WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in versions 8.6.0 through 9.0.2. This is due to the `store_settings()` method in the `ExactMetrics_Onboarding` class accepting a user-supplied `triggered_by` parameter that is used instead of the current user's ID to check permissions. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with the `exactmetrics_save_settings` capability to bypass the `install_plugins` capability check by specifying an administrator's user ID in the `triggered_by` parameter, allowing them to install arbitrary plugins and achieve Remote Code Execution. This vulnerability only affects sites on which administrator has given other user types the permission to view reports and can only be exploited by users of that type. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1965 | 2 Curl, Haxx | 2 Curl, Curl | 2026-03-20 | 6.5 Medium |
| libcurl can in some circumstances reuse the wrong connection when asked to do an Negotiate-authenticated HTTP or HTTPS request. libcurl features a pool of recent connections so that subsequent requests can reuse an existing connection to avoid overhead. When reusing a connection a range of criterion must first be met. Due to a logical error in the code, a request that was issued by an application could wrongfully reuse an existing connection to the same server that was authenticated using different credentials. One underlying reason being that Negotiate sometimes authenticates *connections* and not *requests*, contrary to how HTTP is designed to work. An application that allows Negotiate authentication to a server (that responds wanting Negotiate) with `user1:password1` and then does another operation to the same server also using Negotiate but with `user2:password2` (while the previous connection is still alive) - the second request wrongly reused the same connection and since it then sees that the Negotiate negotiation is already made, it just sends the request over that connection thinking it uses the user2 credentials when it is in fact still using the connection authenticated for user1... The set of authentication methods to use is set with `CURLOPT_HTTPAUTH`. Applications can disable libcurl's reuse of connections and thus mitigate this problem, by using one of the following libcurl options to alter how connections are or are not reused: `CURLOPT_FRESH_CONNECT`, `CURLOPT_MAXCONNECTS` and `CURLMOPT_MAX_HOST_CONNECTIONS` (if using the curl_multi API). | ||||
| CVE-2026-3783 | 2 Curl, Haxx | 2 Curl, Curl | 2026-03-20 | 5.3 Medium |
| When an OAuth2 bearer token is used for an HTTP(S) transfer, and that transfer performs a redirect to a second URL, curl could leak that token to the second hostname under some circumstances. If the hostname that the first request is redirected to has information in the used .netrc file, with either of the `machine` or `default` keywords, curl would pass on the bearer token set for the first host also to the second one. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3784 | 2 Curl, Haxx | 2 Curl, Curl | 2026-03-20 | 6.5 Medium |
| curl would wrongly reuse an existing HTTP proxy connection doing CONNECT to a server, even if the new request uses different credentials for the HTTP proxy. The proper behavior is to create or use a separate connection. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3805 | 2 Curl, Haxx | 2 Curl, Curl | 2026-03-20 | 7.5 High |
| When doing a second SMB request to the same host again, curl would wrongly use a data pointer pointing into already freed memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3943 | 1 H3c | 1 Acg1000-ak230 | 2026-03-20 | 7.3 High |
| A vulnerability was found in H3C ACG1000-AK230 up to 20260227. This affects an unknown part of the file /webui/?aaa_portal_auth_local_submit. The manipulation of the argument suffix results in command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor is investigating and remediating this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2023-27573 | 1 Netbox | 1 Netbox-docker | 2026-03-20 | 9 Critical |
| netbox-docker before 2.5.0 has a superuser account with default credentials (admin password for the admin account, and 0123456789abcdef0123456789abcdef01234567 value for SUPERUSER_API_TOKEN). In practice on the public Internet, almost all users changed the password but only about 90% changed the token. Having a default token value was intentional and was valuable for the main intended use case of the netbox-docker product (isolated development networks). Some users engaged in an effort to repurpose netbox-docker for production. The documentation for this effort stated that the defaults must not be used. However, installation did not ensure non-default values. The Supplier was aware of the CVE ID assignment and did not object to the assignment. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66956 | 1 Asseco | 1 See Live | 2026-03-20 | 9.9 Critical |
| Insecure Access Control in Contact Plan, E-Mail, SMS and Fax components in Asseco SEE Live 2.0 allows remote attackers to access and execute attachments via a computable URL. | ||||
| CVE-2025-67034 | 1 Lantronix | 7 Eds5000, Eds5008, Eds5008 Firmware and 4 more | 2026-03-20 | 8.8 High |
| An issue was discovered in Lantronix EDS5000 2.1.0.0R3. An authenticated attacker can inject OS commands into the "name" parameter when deleting SSL credentials through the management interface. Injected commands are executed with root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2025-67035 | 1 Lantronix | 7 Eds5000, Eds5008, Eds5008 Firmware and 4 more | 2026-03-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Lantronix EDS5000 2.1.0.0R3. The SSH Client and SSH Server pages are affected by multiple OS injection vulnerabilities due to missing sanitization of input parameters. An attacker can inject arbitrary commands in delete actions of various objects, such as server keys, users, and known hosts. Commands are executed with root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2025-67036 | 1 Lantronix | 7 Eds5000, Eds5008, Eds5008 Firmware and 4 more | 2026-03-20 | 8.8 High |
| An issue was discovered in Lantronix EDS5000 2.1.0.0R3. The Log Info page allows users to see log files by specifying their names. Due to a missing sanitization in the file name parameter, an authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary OS commands that are executed with root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2025-67037 | 1 Lantronix | 7 Eds5000, Eds5008, Eds5008 Firmware and 4 more | 2026-03-20 | 8.8 High |
| An issue was discovered in Lantronix EDS5000 2.1.0.0R3. An authenticated attacker can inject OS commands into the "tunnel" parameter when killing a tunnel connection. Injected commands are executed with root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2025-67038 | 1 Lantronix | 7 Eds5000, Eds5008, Eds5008 Firmware and 4 more | 2026-03-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Lantronix EDS5000 2.1.0.0R3. The HTTP RPC module executes a shell command to write logs when user's authantication fails. The username is directly concatenated with the command without any sanitization. This allow attackers to inject arbitrary OS commands into the username parameter. Injected commands are executed with root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2025-67039 | 1 Lantronix | 5 Eds3000ps, Eds3008ps1ns, Eds3008ps1ns Firmware and 2 more | 2026-03-20 | 9.1 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Lantronix EDS3000PS 3.1.0.0R2. The authentication on management pages can be bypassed by appending a specific suffix to the URL and by sending an Authorization header that uses "admin" as the username. | ||||
| CVE-2025-67041 | 1 Lantronix | 5 Eds3000ps, Eds3008ps1ns, Eds3008ps1ns Firmware and 2 more | 2026-03-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Lantronix EDS3000PS 3.1.0.0R2. The host parameter of the TFTP client in the Filesystem Browser page is not properly sanitized. This can be exploited to escape from the original command and execute an arbitrary one with root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2025-67298 | 1 Classroomio | 1 Classroomio | 2026-03-20 | 8.1 High |
| An issue in ClasroomIO before v.0.2.6 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the endpoints /api/verify and /rest/v1/profile | ||||
| CVE-2025-68623 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Directx End-user Runtime Web Installer | 2026-03-20 | 8.8 High |
| In Microsoft DirectX End-User Runtime Web Installer 9.29.1974.0, a low-privilege user can replace an executable file during the installation process, which may result in unintended elevation of privileges. During installation, the installer runs with HIGH integrity and downloads executables and DLLs to the %TEMP% folder - writable by standard users. Subsequently, the installer executes the downloaded executable with HIGH integrity to complete the application installation. However, an attacker can replace the downloaded executable with a malicious, user-controlled executable. When the installer executes this replaced file, it runs the attacker's code with HIGH integrity. Since code running at HIGH integrity can escalate to SYSTEM level by registering and executing a service, this creates a complete privilege escalation chain from standard user to SYSTEM. NOTE: The Supplier disputes this record stating that they have determined this to be the behavior as designed. | ||||
| CVE-2025-70024 | 1 Benkeen | 1 Generatedata | 2026-03-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue pertaining to CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command was discovered in benkeen generatedata 4.0.14. | ||||
| CVE-2025-70027 | 1 Sunbird-ed | 1 Sunbirded-portal | 2026-03-20 | 7.5 High |
| An issue pertaining to CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery was discovered in Sunbird-Ed SunbirdEd-portal v1.13.4. This allows attackers to obtain sensitive information | ||||