Export limit exceeded: 330878 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (330878 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-27265 | 1 Adobe | 2 Adobe Experience Manager, Experience Manager | 2026-03-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27264 | 1 Adobe | 2 Adobe Experience Manager, Experience Manager | 2026-03-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27263 | 1 Adobe | 2 Adobe Experience Manager, Experience Manager | 2026-03-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27262 | 1 Adobe | 2 Adobe Experience Manager, Experience Manager | 2026-03-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. | ||||
| CVE-2025-70030 | 1 Sunbird-ed | 1 Sunbirded-portal | 2026-03-11 | N/A |
| An issue pertaining to CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity (4.19) was discovered in Sunbird-Ed SunbirdEd-portal v1.13.4. | ||||
| CVE-2025-70027 | 2026-03-11 | N/A | ||
| An issue pertaining to CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery was discovered in Sunbird-Ed SunbirdEd-portal v1.13.4. This allows attackers to obtain sensitive information | ||||
| CVE-2025-70031 | 1 Sunbird-ed | 1 Sunbirded-portal | 2026-03-11 | N/A |
| An issue pertaining to CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery was discovered in Sunbird-Ed SunbirdEd-portal v1.13.4. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66413 | 1 Gitforwindows | 1 Git | 2026-03-11 | 7.4 High |
| Git for Windows is the Windows port of Git. Prior to 2.53.0(2), it is possible to obtain a user's NTLM hash by tricking them into cloning from a malicious server. Since NTLM hashing is weak, it is possible for the attacker to brute-force the user's account name and password. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.53.0(2). | ||||
| CVE-2026-1965 | 2026-03-11 | N/A | ||
| libcurl can in some circumstances reuse the wrong connection when asked to do an Negotiate-authenticated HTTP or HTTPS request. libcurl features a pool of recent connections so that subsequent requests can reuse an existing connection to avoid overhead. When reusing a connection a range of criterion must first be met. Due to a logical error in the code, a request that was issued by an application could wrongfully reuse an existing connection to the same server that was authenticated using different credentials. One underlying reason being that Negotiate sometimes authenticates *connections* and not *requests*, contrary to how HTTP is designed to work. An application that allows Negotiate authentication to a server (that responds wanting Negotiate) with `user1:password1` and then does another operation to the same server also using Negotiate but with `user2:password2` (while the previous connection is still alive) - the second request wrongly reused the same connection and since it then sees that the Negotiate negotiation is already made, it just sends the request over that connection thinking it uses the user2 credentials when it is in fact still using the connection authenticated for user1... The set of authentication methods to use is set with `CURLOPT_HTTPAUTH`. Applications can disable libcurl's reuse of connections and thus mitigate this problem, by using one of the following libcurl options to alter how connections are or are not reused: `CURLOPT_FRESH_CONNECT`, `CURLOPT_MAXCONNECTS` and `CURLMOPT_MAX_HOST_CONNECTIONS` (if using the curl_multi API). | ||||
| CVE-2025-70032 | 1 Sunbird-ed | 1 Sunbirded-portal | 2026-03-11 | N/A |
| An issue pertaining to CWE-601: URL Redirection to Untrusted Site was discovered in Sunbird-Ed SunbirdEd-portal v1.13.4. | ||||
| CVE-2025-70330 | 2026-03-11 | N/A | ||
| Easy Grade Pro 4.1.0.2 contains a file parsing logic flaw in the handling of proprietary .EGP gradebook files. By modifying specific fields at precise offsets within an otherwise valid .EGP file, an attacker can trigger an out-of-bounds memory read during parsing. This results in an unhandled access violation and application crash, leading to a local denial-of-service condition when the crafted file is opened by a user. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6723 | 1 Chef | 1 Inspec | 2026-03-11 | N/A |
| Chef InSpec versions up to 5.23 and before 7.0.107 creates named pipes with overly permissive default Windows access controls. A local attacker may interfere with the pipe connection process and exploit the insufficient access restrictions to assume the InSpec execution context, potentially resulting in elevated privileges or operational disruption. This issue affects Chef Inspec: through 5.23 and before 7.0.107 | ||||
| CVE-2025-56421 | 1 Limesurvey | 1 Limesurvey | 2026-03-11 | 7.5 High |
| SQL Injection vulnerability in LimeSurvey before v.6.15.4+250710 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information from the database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2742 | 1 Vaadin | 2 Flow, Vaadin | 2026-03-11 | N/A |
| An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in Vaadin 14.0.0 through 14.14.0, 23.0.0 through 23.6.6, 24.0.0 through 24.9.7 and 25.0.0 through 25.0.1, applications using Spring Security due to inconsistent path pattern matching of reserved framework paths. Accessing the /VAADIN endpoint without a trailing slash bypasses security filters, and allowing unauthenticated users to trigger framework initialization and create sessions without proper authorization. Users of affected versions using Spring Security should upgrade as follows: 14.0.0-14.14.0 upgrade to 14.14.1, 23.0.0-23.6.6 to 23.6.7, 24.0.0 - 24.9.7 to 24.9.8, and 25.0.0-25.0.1 upgrade to 25.0.2 or newer. Please note that Vaadin versions 10-13 and 15-22 are no longer supported and you should update either to the latest 14, 23, 24, 25 version. | ||||
| CVE-2026-26801 | 1 Bpampuch | 1 Pdfmake | 2026-03-11 | 7.5 High |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in pdfmake versions 0.3.0-beta.2 through 0.3.5 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the src/URLResolver.js component. The fix was released in version 0.3.6 which introduces the setUrlAccessPolicy() method allowing server operators to define URL access rules. A warning is now logged when pdfmake is used server-side without a policy configured. | ||||
| CVE-2026-23907 | 1 Apache | 1 Pdfbox Examples | 2026-03-11 | 5.3 Medium |
| This issue affects the ExtractEmbeddedFiles example in Apache PDFBox: from 2.0.24 through 2.0.35, from 3.0.0 through 3.0.6. The ExtractEmbeddedFiles example contains a path traversal vulnerability (CWE-22) because the filename that is obtained from PDComplexFileSpecification.getFilename() is appended to the extraction path. Users who have copied this example into their production code should review it to ensure that the extraction path is acceptable. The example has been changed accordingly, now the initial path and the extraction paths are converted into canonical paths and it is verified that extraction path contains the initial path. The documentation has also been adjusted. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30822 | 1 Flowiseai | 1 Flowise | 2026-03-11 | N/A |
| Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to version 3.0.13, unauthenticated users can inject arbitrary values into internal database fields when creating leads. This issue has been patched in version 3.0.13. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30823 | 1 Flowiseai | 1 Flowise | 2026-03-11 | N/A |
| Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to version 3.0.13, there is an IDOR vulnerability, leading to account takeover and enterprise feature bypass via SSO configuration. This issue has been patched in version 3.0.13. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2466 | 2026-03-11 | N/A | ||
| The DukaPress WordPress plugin through 3.2.4 does not sanitise and escape a parameter before outputting it back in the page, leading to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting which could be used against high privilege users such as admin. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1454 | 2026-03-11 | 7.2 High | ||
| The Responsive Contact Form Builder & Lead Generation Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.1 via form field submissions. This is due to insufficient input sanitization in the lfb_lead_sanitize() function which omits certain field types from its sanitization whitelist, combined with an overly permissive wp_kses() filter at output time that allows onclick attributes on anchor tags. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever an administrator views the lead entries in the WordPress dashboard. | ||||