Export limit exceeded: 326162 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (326162 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-0038 | 2026-03-02 | 8.4 High | ||
| In multiple functions of mem_protect.c, there is a possible way to execute arbitrary code due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0037 | 2026-03-02 | 8.4 High | ||
| In multiple functions of ffa.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0035 | 2026-03-02 | 8.4 High | ||
| In createRequest of MediaProvider.java, there is a possible way for an app to gain read/write access to non-existing files due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0034 | 2026-03-02 | 8.4 High | ||
| In setPackageOrComponentEnabled of ManagedServices.java, there is a possible notification policy desync due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0031 | 2026-03-02 | 8.4 High | ||
| In multiple functions of mem_protect.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0030 | 2026-03-02 | 8.4 High | ||
| In __host_check_page_state_range of mem_protect.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0028 | 2026-03-02 | 8.4 High | ||
| In __pkvm_host_share_guest of mem_protect.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-69873 | 2 Ajv-validator, Ajv.js | 2 Ajv, Ajv | 2026-03-02 | 2.9 Low |
| ajv (Another JSON Schema Validator) before 8.18.0 is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when the $data option is enabled. The pattern keyword accepts runtime data via JSON Pointer syntax ($data reference), which is passed directly to the JavaScript RegExp() constructor without validation. An attacker can inject a malicious regex pattern (e.g., "^(a|a)*$") combined with crafted input to cause catastrophic backtracking. A 31-character payload causes approximately 44 seconds of CPU blocking, with each additional character doubling execution time. This enables complete denial of service with a single HTTP request against any API using ajv with $data: true for dynamic schema validation. This issue is also fixed in version 6.14.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32313 | 2026-03-02 | 8.4 High | ||
| In UsageEvents of UsageEvents.java, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43766 | 2026-03-02 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| In multiple functions of btm_ble_sec.cc, there is a possible unencrypted communication due to Invalid error handling. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-24783 | 1 Script3 | 1 Soroban-fixed-point-math | 2026-03-02 | 7.5 High |
| soroban-fixed-point-math is a fixed-point math library for Soroban smart contacts. In versions 1.3.0 and 1.4.0, the `mulDiv(x, y, z)` function incorrectly handled cases where both the intermediate product $x * y$ and the divisor $z$ were negative. The logic assumed that if the intermediate product was negative, the final result must also be negative, neglecting the sign of $z$. This resulted in rounding being applied in the wrong direction for cases where both $x * y$ and $z$ were negative. The functions most at risk are `fixed_div_floor` and `fixed_div_ceil`, as they often use non-constant numbers as the divisor $z$ in `mulDiv`. This error is present in all signed `FixedPoint` and `SorobanFixedPoint` implementations, including `i64`, `i128`, and `I256`. Versions 1.3.1 and 1.4.1 contain a patch. No known workarounds for this issue are available. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5225 | 1 Libtiff | 1 Libtiff | 2026-03-02 | 8.8 High |
| LibTIFF version 4.0.7 is vulnerable to a heap buffer overflow in the tools/tiffcp resulting in DoS or code execution via a crafted BitsPerSample value. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0020 | 2026-03-02 | N/A | ||
| In parsePermissionGroup of ParsedPermissionUtils.java, there is a possible way to bypass a consent dialog to obtain permissions due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28218 | 1 Discourse | 1 Discourse | 2026-03-02 | 5.4 Medium |
| Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0, fail-open access control in Data Explorer plugin allows any authenticated user to execute SQL queries that have no explicit group assignments, including built-in system queries. Versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 patch the issue. As a workaround, either explicitly set group permissions on each Data Explorer query that doesn't have permissions, or disable discourse-data-explorer plugin. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0021 | 2026-03-02 | 8.4 High | ||
| In hasInteractAcrossUsersFullPermission of AppInfoBase.java, there is a possible cross-user permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25430 | 2 Cdome, Comodo | 3 Comodo Dome Firewall, Comodo Dome Firewall, Dome Firewall | 2026-03-02 | 6.1 Medium |
| Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the username parameter. Attackers can send POST requests to the vpn_users endpoint with script payloads in the username field to execute arbitrary JavaScript in victim browsers. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25429 | 2 Cdome, Comodo | 3 Comodo Dome Firewall, Comodo Dome Firewall, Dome Firewall | 2026-03-02 | 6.1 Medium |
| Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the openvpn_advanced endpoint. Attackers can inject JavaScript code through the GLOBAL_NETWORKS and GLOBAL_DNS parameters via POST requests to execute arbitrary scripts in users' browsers. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25428 | 2 Cdome, Comodo | 3 Comodo Dome Firewall, Comodo Dome Firewall, Dome Firewall | 2026-03-02 | 6.1 Medium |
| Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains multiple reflected cross-site scripting vulnerabilities in the openvpn_users endpoint that allow attackers to inject malicious scripts through POST parameters. Attackers can submit crafted POST requests with script payloads in the username, remotenets, explicitroutes, static_ip, custom_dns, or custom_domain parameters to execute arbitrary JavaScript in users' browsers. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25427 | 2 Cdome, Comodo | 3 Comodo Dome Firewall, Comodo Dome Firewall, Dome Firewall | 2026-03-02 | 6.1 Medium |
| Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the antispyware endpoint. Attackers can send POST requests with JavaScript payloads in the DNSMASQ_WHITELIST or DNSMASQ_BLACKLIST parameters to execute arbitrary code in users' browsers. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25426 | 2 Cdome, Comodo | 3 Comodo Dome Firewall, Comodo Dome Firewall, Dome Firewall | 2026-03-02 | 6.1 Medium |
| Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the dnsmasq endpoint. Attackers can send POST requests with script payloads in the TRANSPARENT_SOURCE_BYPASS or TRANSPARENT_DESTINATION_BYPASS parameters to execute arbitrary JavaScript in users' browsers. | ||||