Export limit exceeded: 336584 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (336584 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-66614 | 2 Apache, Apache Tomcat | 2 Tomcat, Apache Tomcat | 2026-03-24 | 7.6 High |
| Improper Input Validation vulnerability. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.14, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.49, from 9.0.0-M1 through 9.0.112. The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are known to be affected: 8.5.0 through 8.5.100. Older EOL versions are not affected. Tomcat did not validate that the host name provided via the SNI extension was the same as the host name provided in the HTTP host header field. If Tomcat was configured with more than one virtual host and the TLS configuration for one of those hosts did not require client certificate authentication but another one did, it was possible for a client to bypass the client certificate authentication by sending different host names in the SNI extension and the HTTP host header field. The vulnerability only applies if client certificate authentication is only enforced at the Connector. It does not apply if client certificate authentication is enforced at the web application. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.15 or later, 10.1.50 or later or 9.0.113 or later, which fix the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2022-49267 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-03-24 | 6.7 Medium |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6170 | 2 Redhat, Xmlsoft | 5 Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services, Openshift and 2 more | 2026-03-24 | 2.5 Low |
| A flaw was found in the interactive shell of the xmllint command-line tool, used for parsing XML files. When a user inputs an overly long command, the program does not check the input size properly, which can cause it to crash. This issue might allow attackers to run harmful code in rare configurations without modern protections. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2399 | 1 Mitsubishi Electric | 20 Cnc C80 Series C80, Cnc E70 Series E70, Cnc E80 Series E80 and 17 more | 2026-03-24 | 5.9 Medium |
| Improper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in Input vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric CNC M800V Series M800VW and M800VS, M80V Series M80V and M80VW, M800 Series M800W and M800S, M80 Series M80 and M80W, E80 Series E80, C80 Series C80, M700V Series M750VW, M720VW, 730VW, M720VS, M730VS, and M750VS, M70V Series M70V, E70 Series E70, and Software Tools NC Trainer2 and NC Trainer2 plus allows a remote attacker to cause an out-of-bounds read, resulting in a denial-of-service condition by sending specially crafted packets to TCP port 683. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33060 | 1 Ondata | 1 Ckan-mcp-server | 2026-03-24 | 5.3 Medium |
| CKAN MCP Server is a tool for querying CKAN open data portals. Versions prior to 0.4.85 provide tools including ckan_package_search and sparql_query that accept a base_url parameter, making HTTP requests to arbitrary endpoints without restriction. A CKAN portal client has no legitimate reason to contact cloud metadata or internal network services. There is no URL validation on base_url parameter. No private IP blocking (RFC 1918, link-local 169.254.x.x), no cloud metadata blocking. The sparql_query and ckan_datastore_search_sql tools also accept arbitrary base URLs and expose injection surfaces. An attack can lead to internal network scanning, cloud metadata theft (IAM credentials via IMDS at 169.254.169.254), potential SQL/SPARQL injection via unsanitized query parameters. Attack requires prompt injection to control the base_url parameter. This issue has been fixed in version 0.4.85. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3549 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-03-24 | N/A |
| Heap Overflow in TLS 1.3 ECH parsing. An integer underflow existed in ECH extension parsing logic when calculating a buffer length, which resulted in writing beyond the bounds of an allocated buffer. Note that in wolfSSL, ECH is off by default, and the ECH standard is still evolving. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32912 | 2026-03-23 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32911 | 2026-03-23 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32910 | 2026-03-23 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32909 | 2026-03-23 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32908 | 2026-03-23 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32907 | 2026-03-23 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32904 | 2026-03-23 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32903 | 2026-03-23 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32902 | 2026-03-23 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32901 | 2026-03-23 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32900 | 2026-03-23 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32066 | 2026-03-23 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32047 | 2026-03-23 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32012 | 2026-03-23 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||