Export limit exceeded: 326316 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (2597 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-46830 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Teamcity | 2025-04-23 | 4.1 Medium |
| In JetBrains TeamCity between 2022.10 and 2022.10.1 a custom STS endpoint allowed internal port scanning. | ||||
| CVE-2024-57252 | 1 Otcms | 1 Otcms | 2025-04-22 | 4.3 Medium |
| OtCMS <=V7.46 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in /admin/read.php, which can Read system files arbitrarily. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24862 | 1 Databasir Project | 1 Databasir | 2025-04-22 | 7.7 High |
| Databasir is a team-oriented relational database model document management platform. Databasir 1.01 has Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. During the download verification process of a JDBC driver the corresponding JDBC driver download address will be downloaded first, but this address will return a response page with complete error information when accessing a non-existent URL. Attackers can take advantage of this feature for SSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2022-31106 | 1 Clever | 1 Underscore.deep | 2025-04-22 | 8.3 High |
| Underscore.deep is a collection of Underscore mixins that operate on nested objects. Versions of `underscore.deep` prior to version 0.5.3 are vulnerable to a prototype pollution vulnerability. An attacker can craft a malicious payload and pass it to `deepFromFlat`, which would pollute any future Objects created. Any users that have `deepFromFlat` or `deepPick` (due to its dependency on `deepFromFlat`) in their code should upgrade to version 0.5.3 as soon as possible. Users unable to upgrade may mitigate this issue by modifying `deepFromFlat` to prevent specific keywords which will prevent this from happening. | ||||
| CVE-2022-35949 | 2 Nodejs, Redhat | 2 Undici, Acm | 2025-04-22 | 5.3 Medium |
| undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js.`undici` is vulnerable to SSRF (Server-side Request Forgery) when an application takes in **user input** into the `path/pathname` option of `undici.request`. If a user specifies a URL such as `http://127.0.0.1` or `//127.0.0.1` ```js const undici = require("undici") undici.request({origin: "http://example.com", pathname: "//127.0.0.1"}) ``` Instead of processing the request as `http://example.org//127.0.0.1` (or `http://example.org/http://127.0.0.1` when `http://127.0.0.1 is used`), it actually processes the request as `http://127.0.0.1/` and sends it to `http://127.0.0.1`. If a developer passes in user input into `path` parameter of `undici.request`, it can result in an _SSRF_ as they will assume that the hostname cannot change, when in actual fact it can change because the specified path parameter is combined with the base URL. This issue was fixed in `undici@5.8.1`. The best workaround is to validate user input before passing it to the `undici.request` call. | ||||
| CVE-2022-36071 | 1 Sftpgo Project | 1 Sftpgo | 2025-04-22 | 8.3 High |
| SFTPGo is configurable SFTP server with optional HTTP/S, FTP/S and WebDAV support. SFTPGo WebAdmin and WebClient support login using TOTP (Time-based One Time Passwords) as a secondary authentication factor. Because TOTPs are often configured on mobile devices that can be lost, stolen or damaged, SFTPGo also supports recovery codes. These are a set of one time use codes that can be used instead of the TOTP. In SFTPGo versions from version 2.2.0 to 2.3.3 recovery codes can be generated before enabling two-factor authentication. An attacker who knows the user's password could potentially generate some recovery codes and then bypass two-factor authentication after it is enabled on the account at a later time. This issue has been fixed in version 2.3.4. Recovery codes can now only be generated after enabling two-factor authentication and are deleted after disabling it. | ||||
| CVE-2022-31196 | 1 Databasir | 1 Databasir | 2025-04-22 | 7.6 High |
| Databasir is a database metadata management platform. Databasir <= 1.06 has Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. The SSRF is triggered by a sending a **single** HTTP POST request to create a databaseType. By supplying a `jdbcDriverFileUrl` that returns a non `200` response code, the url is executed, the response is logged (both in terminal and in database) and is included in the response. This would allow an attackers to obtain the real IP address and scan Intranet information. This issue was fixed in version 1.0.7. | ||||
| CVE-2022-36067 | 2 Redhat, Vm2 Project | 3 Acm, Multicluster Engine, Vm2 | 2025-04-22 | 10 Critical |
| vm2 is a sandbox that can run untrusted code with whitelisted Node's built-in modules. In versions prior to version 3.9.11, a threat actor can bypass the sandbox protections to gain remote code execution rights on the host running the sandbox. This vulnerability was patched in the release of version 3.9.11 of vm2. There are no known workarounds. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23464 | 1 Nepxion | 1 Discovery | 2025-04-22 | 4.3 Medium |
| Nepxion Discovery is a solution for Spring Cloud. Discovery is vulnerable to a potential Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). RouterResourceImpl uses RestTemplate’s getForEntity to retrieve the contents of a URL containing user-controlled input, potentially resulting in Information Disclosure. There is no patch available for this issue at time of publication. There are no known workarounds. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23463 | 1 Nepxion | 1 Discovery | 2025-04-22 | 9.4 Critical |
| Nepxion Discovery is a solution for Spring Cloud. Discover is vulnerable to SpEL Injection in discovery-commons. DiscoveryExpressionResolver’s eval method is evaluating expression with a StandardEvaluationContext, allowing the expression to reach and interact with Java classes such as java.lang.Runtime, leading to Remote Code Execution. There is no patch available for this issue at time of publication. There are no known workarounds. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29453 | 1 Personal-management-system | 1 Personal Management System | 2025-04-22 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue in personal-management-system Personal Management System 1.4.65 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the my-contacts-settings component. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29454 | 1 Personal-management-system | 1 Personal Management System | 2025-04-22 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue in personal-management-system Personal Management System 1.4.65 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the Upload function. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29455 | 1 Personal-management-system | 1 Personal Management System | 2025-04-22 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue in personal-management-system Personal Management System 1.4.65 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the Travel Ideas" function. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29456 | 1 Personal-management-system | 1 Personal Management System | 2025-04-22 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue in personal-management-system Personal Management System 1.4.65 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the create Notes function. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23654 | 1 Discourse | 1 Ai | 2025-04-22 | 4.1 Medium |
| discourse-ai is the AI plugin for the open-source discussion platform Discourse. Prior to commit 94ba0dadc2cf38e8f81c3936974c167219878edd, interactions with different AI services are vulnerable to admin-initiated SSRF attacks. Versions of the plugin that include commit 94ba0dadc2cf38e8f81c3936974c167219878edd contain a patch. As a workaround, one may disable the discourse-ai plugin. | ||||
| CVE-2024-0243 | 2 Langchain, Langchain-ai | 2 Langchain, Langchain-ai\/langchain | 2025-04-22 | 8.1 High |
| With the following crawler configuration: ```python from bs4 import BeautifulSoup as Soup url = "https://example.com" loader = RecursiveUrlLoader( url=url, max_depth=2, extractor=lambda x: Soup(x, "html.parser").text ) docs = loader.load() ``` An attacker in control of the contents of `https://example.com` could place a malicious HTML file in there with links like "https://example.completely.different/my_file.html" and the crawler would proceed to download that file as well even though `prevent_outside=True`. https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/blob/bf0b3cc0b5ade1fb95a5b1b6fa260e99064c2e22/libs/community/langchain_community/document_loaders/recursive_url_loader.py#L51-L51 Resolved in https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/pull/15559 | ||||
| CVE-2022-39276 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2025-04-22 | 3.5 Low |
| GLPI stands for Gestionnaire Libre de Parc Informatique. GLPI is a Free Asset and IT Management Software package that provides ITIL Service Desk features, licenses tracking and software auditing. Usage of RSS feeds or an external calendar in planning is subject to SSRF exploit. In case a remote script returns a redirect response, the redirect target URL is not checked against the URL allow list defined by administrator. This issue has been patched, please upgrade to 10.0.4. There are currently no known workarounds. | ||||
| CVE-2022-3510 | 2 Google, Redhat | 5 Protobuf-java, Protobuf-javalite, Jboss Enterprise Bpms Platform and 2 more | 2025-04-22 | 7.5 High |
| A parsing issue similar to CVE-2022-3171, but with Message-Type Extensions in protobuf-java core and lite versions prior to 3.21.7, 3.20.3, 3.19.6 and 3.16.3 can lead to a denial of service attack. Inputs containing multiple instances of non-repeated embedded messages with repeated or unknown fields causes objects to be converted back-n-forth between mutable and immutable forms, resulting in potentially long garbage collection pauses. We recommend updating to the versions mentioned above. | ||||
| CVE-2022-3509 | 2 Google, Redhat | 5 Protobuf-java, Protobuf-javalite, Jboss Enterprise Bpms Platform and 2 more | 2025-04-22 | 7.5 High |
| A parsing issue similar to CVE-2022-3171, but with textformat in protobuf-java core and lite versions prior to 3.21.7, 3.20.3, 3.19.6 and 3.16.3 can lead to a denial of service attack. Inputs containing multiple instances of non-repeated embedded messages with repeated or unknown fields causes objects to be converted back-n-forth between mutable and immutable forms, resulting in potentially long garbage collection pauses. We recommend updating to the versions mentioned above. | ||||
| CVE-2022-29309 | 1 Wangl1989 | 1 Mysiteforme | 2025-04-22 | 7.5 High |
| mysiteforme v2.2.1 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery. | ||||