Export limit exceeded: 326032 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 326032 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (1522 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2009-0563 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Office, Office Compatibility Pack, Office Word Viewer and 1 more | 2025-10-22 | 7.8 High |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word 2002 SP3, 2003 SP3, and 2007 SP1 and SP2; Microsoft Office for Mac 2004 and 2008; Open XML File Format Converter for Mac; Microsoft Office Word Viewer 2003 SP3; Microsoft Office Word Viewer; and Microsoft Office Compatibility Pack for Word, Excel, and PowerPoint 2007 File Formats SP1 and SP2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a Word document with a crafted tag containing an invalid length field, aka "Word Buffer Overflow Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2007-5659 | 2 Adobe, Redhat | 3 Acrobat, Acrobat Reader, Rhel Extras | 2025-10-22 | 7.8 High |
| Multiple buffer overflows in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 8.1.1 and earlier allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a PDF file with long arguments to unspecified JavaScript methods. NOTE: this issue might be subsumed by CVE-2008-0655. | ||||
| CVE-2005-2773 | 1 Hp | 1 Openview Network Node Manager | 2025-10-22 | 9.8 Critical |
| HP OpenView Network Node Manager 6.2 through 7.50 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the (1) node parameter to connectedNodes.ovpl, (2) cdpView.ovpl, (3) freeIPaddrs.ovpl, and (4) ecscmg.ovpl. | ||||
| CVE-2002-0367 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Windows 2000, Windows Nt | 2025-10-22 | 7.8 High |
| smss.exe debugging subsystem in Windows NT and Windows 2000 does not properly authenticate programs that connect to other programs, which allows local users to gain administrator or SYSTEM privileges by duplicating a handle to a privileged process, as demonstrated by DebPloit. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9841 | 2 Oracle, Phpunit Project | 2 Communications Diameter Signaling Router, Phpunit | 2025-10-22 | 9.8 Critical |
| Util/PHP/eval-stdin.php in PHPUnit before 4.8.28 and 5.x before 5.6.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via HTTP POST data beginning with a "<?php " substring, as demonstrated by an attack on a site with an exposed /vendor folder, i.e., external access to the /vendor/phpunit/phpunit/src/Util/PHP/eval-stdin.php URI. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9822 | 1 Dnnsoftware | 1 Dotnetnuke | 2025-10-22 | 8.8 High |
| DNN (aka DotNetNuke) before 9.1.1 has Remote Code Execution via a cookie, aka "2017-08 (Critical) Possible remote code execution on DNN sites." | ||||
| CVE-2017-9805 | 3 Apache, Cisco, Netapp | 7 Struts, Digital Media Manager, Hosted Collaboration Solution and 4 more | 2025-10-22 | 8.1 High |
| The REST Plugin in Apache Struts 2.1.1 through 2.3.x before 2.3.34 and 2.5.x before 2.5.13 uses an XStreamHandler with an instance of XStream for deserialization without any type filtering, which can lead to Remote Code Execution when deserializing XML payloads. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9791 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-10-22 | 9.8 Critical |
| The Struts 1 plugin in Apache Struts 2.1.x and 2.3.x might allow remote code execution via a malicious field value passed in a raw message to the ActionMessage. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9248 | 2 Progress, Telerik | 2 Sitefinity, Ui For Asp.net Ajax | 2025-10-22 | 9.8 Critical |
| Telerik.Web.UI.dll in Progress Telerik UI for ASP.NET AJAX before R2 2017 SP1 and Sitefinity before 10.0.6412.0 does not properly protect Telerik.Web.UI.DialogParametersEncryptionKey or the MachineKey, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms, leading to a MachineKey leak, arbitrary file uploads or downloads, XSS, or ASP.NET ViewState compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8759 | 1 Microsoft | 11 .net Framework, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1511 and 8 more | 2025-10-22 | 7.8 High |
| Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4.5.2, 4.6, 4.6.1, 4.6.2 and 4.7 allow an attacker to execute code remotely via a malicious document or application, aka ".NET Framework Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2017-8570 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Office | 2025-10-22 | 7.8 High |
| Microsoft Office allows a remote code execution vulnerability due to the way that it handles objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0243. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8543 | 1 Microsoft | 10 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1511, Windows 10 1607 and 7 more | 2025-10-22 | 9.8 Critical |
| Microsoft Windows XP SP3, Windows XP x64 XP2, Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista, Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1 and Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2012 and R2, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allow an attacker to take control of the affected system when Windows Search fails to handle objects in memory, aka "Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". | ||||
| CVE-2017-8540 | 1 Microsoft | 19 Endpoint Protection, Exchange Server, Forefront Endpoint Protection and 16 more | 2025-10-22 | 7.8 High |
| The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to memory corruption. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8538 and CVE-2017-8541. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8464 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Windows 10 1511, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1703 and 6 more | 2025-10-22 | 8.8 High |
| Windows Shell in Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows local users or remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted .LNK file, which is not properly handled during icon display in Windows Explorer or any other application that parses the icon of the shortcut. aka "LNK Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2017-8291 | 3 Artifex, Debian, Redhat | 9 Ghostscript, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux and 6 more | 2025-10-22 | 7.8 High |
| Artifex Ghostscript through 2017-04-26 allows -dSAFER bypass and remote command execution via .rsdparams type confusion with a "/OutputFile (%pipe%" substring in a crafted .eps document that is an input to the gs program, as exploited in the wild in April 2017. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7494 | 3 Debian, Redhat, Samba | 9 Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus and 6 more | 2025-10-22 | 9.8 Critical |
| Samba since version 3.5.0 and before 4.6.4, 4.5.10 and 4.4.14 is vulnerable to remote code execution vulnerability, allowing a malicious client to upload a shared library to a writable share, and then cause the server to load and execute it. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7269 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Internet Information Services, Windows Server 2003 | 2025-10-22 | 9.8 Critical |
| Buffer overflow in the ScStoragePathFromUrl function in the WebDAV service in Internet Information Services (IIS) 6.0 in Microsoft Windows Server 2003 R2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long header beginning with "If: <http://" in a PROPFIND request, as exploited in the wild in July or August 2016. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6884 | 1 Zyxel | 2 Emg2926, Emg2926 Firmware | 2025-10-22 | 8.8 High |
| A command injection vulnerability was discovered on the Zyxel EMG2926 home router with firmware V1.00(AAQT.4)b8. The vulnerability is located in the diagnostic tools, specifically the nslookup function. A malicious user may exploit numerous vectors to execute arbitrary commands on the router, such as the ping_ip parameter to the expert/maintenance/diagnostic/nslookup URI. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6744 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2025-10-22 | 8.8 High |
| The Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) subsystem of Cisco IOS and IOS XE Software contains multiple vulnerabilities that could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to remotely execute code on an affected system or cause an affected system to reload. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending a crafted SNMP packet to an affected system via IPv4 or IPv6. Only traffic directed to an affected system can be used to exploit these vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities are due to a buffer overflow condition in the SNMP subsystem of the affected software. The vulnerabilities affect all versions of SNMP - Versions 1, 2c, and 3. To exploit these vulnerabilities via SNMP Version 2c or earlier, the attacker must know the SNMP read-only community string for the affected system. To exploit these vulnerabilities via SNMP Version 3, the attacker must have user credentials for the affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code and obtain full control of the affected system or cause the affected system to reload. Customers are advised to apply the workaround as contained in the Workarounds section below. Fixed software information is available via the Cisco IOS Software Checker. All devices that have enabled SNMP and have not explicitly excluded the affected MIBs or OIDs should be considered vulnerable. There are workarounds that address these vulnerabilities. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6739 | 1 Cisco | 2 Ios, Ios Xe | 2025-10-22 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability in the SNMP implementation of could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to cause a reload of the affected system or to remotely execute code. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted SNMP packet to the affected device. The vulnerability is due to a buffer overflow in the affected code area. The vulnerability affects all versions of SNMP (versions 1, 2c, and 3). The attacker must know the SNMP read only community string (SNMP version 2c or earlier) or the user credentials (SNMPv3). An exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code and obtain full control of the system or to cause a reload of the affected system. Only traffic directed to the affected system can be used to exploit this vulnerability. | ||||