Search
Search Results (324384 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-46491 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Matthew Muro Multi-Column Taxonomy List allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Multi-Column Taxonomy List: from n/a through 1.5. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23482 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 7.1 High |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in NotFound azurecurve Floating Featured Image allows Reflected XSS. This issue affects azurecurve Floating Featured Image: from n/a through 2.2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22547 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 7.1 High |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Jay Krishnan G JK Html To Pdf allows Stored XSS.This issue affects JK Html To Pdf: from n/a through 1.0.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41081 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2025-07-12 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ila: block BH in ila_output() As explained in commit 1378817486d6 ("tipc: block BH before using dst_cache"), net/core/dst_cache.c helpers need to be called with BH disabled. ila_output() is called from lwtunnel_output() possibly from process context, and under rcu_read_lock(). We might be interrupted by a softirq, re-enter ila_output() and corrupt dst_cache data structures. Fix the race by using local_bh_disable(). | ||||
| CVE-2025-39595 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 9.3 Critical |
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Quentn.com GmbH Quentn WP allows SQL Injection. This issue affects Quentn WP: from n/a through 1.2.8. | ||||
| CVE-2021-47667 | 1 Zend | 1 Zendto | 2025-07-12 | 10 Critical |
| An OS command injection vulnerability in lib/NSSDropoff.php in ZendTo 5.24-3 through 6.x before 6.10-7 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the tmp_name parameter when dropping off a file via a POST /dropoff request. | ||||
| CVE-2022-49658 | 1 Linux | 1 Kernel | 2025-07-12 | 6.0 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix insufficient bounds propagation from adjust_scalar_min_max_vals Kuee reported a corner case where the tnum becomes constant after the call to __reg_bound_offset(), but the register's bounds are not, that is, its min bounds are still not equal to the register's max bounds. This in turn allows to leak pointers through turning a pointer register as is into an unknown scalar via adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(). Before: func#0 @0 0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) R10=fp(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) 0: (b7) r0 = 1 ; R0_w=scalar(imm=1,umin=1,umax=1,var_off=(0x1; 0x0)) 1: (b7) r3 = 0 ; R3_w=scalar(imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) 2: (87) r3 = -r3 ; R3_w=scalar() 3: (87) r3 = -r3 ; R3_w=scalar() 4: (47) r3 |= 32767 ; R3_w=scalar(smin=-9223372036854743041,umin=32767,var_off=(0x7fff; 0xffffffffffff8000),s32_min=-2147450881) 5: (75) if r3 s>= 0x0 goto pc+1 ; R3_w=scalar(umin=9223372036854808575,var_off=(0x8000000000007fff; 0x7fffffffffff8000),s32_min=-2147450881,u32_min=32767) 6: (95) exit from 5 to 7: R0=scalar(imm=1,umin=1,umax=1,var_off=(0x1; 0x0)) R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) R3=scalar(umin=32767,umax=9223372036854775807,var_off=(0x7fff; 0x7fffffffffff8000),s32_min=-2147450881) R10=fp(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) 7: (d5) if r3 s<= 0x8000 goto pc+1 ; R3=scalar(umin=32769,umax=9223372036854775807,var_off=(0x7fff; 0x7fffffffffff8000),s32_min=-2147450881,u32_min=32767) 8: (95) exit from 7 to 9: R0=scalar(imm=1,umin=1,umax=1,var_off=(0x1; 0x0)) R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) R3=scalar(umin=32767,umax=32768,var_off=(0x7fff; 0x8000)) R10=fp(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) 9: (07) r3 += -32767 ; R3_w=scalar(imm=0,umax=1,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) <--- [*] 10: (95) exit What can be seen here is that R3=scalar(umin=32767,umax=32768,var_off=(0x7fff; 0x8000)) after the operation R3 += -32767 results in a 'malformed' constant, that is, R3_w=scalar(imm=0,umax=1,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)). Intersecting with var_off has not been done at that point via __update_reg_bounds(), which would have improved the umax to be equal to umin. Refactor the tnum <> min/max bounds information flow into a reg_bounds_sync() helper and use it consistently everywhere. After the fix, bounds have been corrected to R3_w=scalar(imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) and thus the register is regarded as a 'proper' constant scalar of 0. After: func#0 @0 0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) R10=fp(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) 0: (b7) r0 = 1 ; R0_w=scalar(imm=1,umin=1,umax=1,var_off=(0x1; 0x0)) 1: (b7) r3 = 0 ; R3_w=scalar(imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) 2: (87) r3 = -r3 ; R3_w=scalar() 3: (87) r3 = -r3 ; R3_w=scalar() 4: (47) r3 |= 32767 ; R3_w=scalar(smin=-9223372036854743041,umin=32767,var_off=(0x7fff; 0xffffffffffff8000),s32_min=-2147450881) 5: (75) if r3 s>= 0x0 goto pc+1 ; R3_w=scalar(umin=9223372036854808575,var_off=(0x8000000000007fff; 0x7fffffffffff8000),s32_min=-2147450881,u32_min=32767) 6: (95) exit from 5 to 7: R0=scalar(imm=1,umin=1,umax=1,var_off=(0x1; 0x0)) R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) R3=scalar(umin=32767,umax=9223372036854775807,var_off=(0x7fff; 0x7fffffffffff8000),s32_min=-2147450881) R10=fp(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) 7: (d5) if r3 s<= 0x8000 goto pc+1 ; R3=scalar(umin=32769,umax=9223372036854775807,var_off=(0x7fff; 0x7fffffffffff8000),s32_min=-2147450881,u32_min=32767) 8: (95) exit from 7 to 9: R0=scalar(imm=1,umin=1,umax=1,var_off=(0x1; 0x0)) R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) R3=scalar(umin=32767,umax=32768,var_off=(0x7fff; 0x8000)) R10=fp(off=0 ---truncated--- | ||||
| CVE-2024-11994 | 1 Elastic | 1 Apm Server | 2025-07-12 | 5.7 Medium |
| APM server logs could contain parts of the document body from a partially failed bulk index request. Depending on the nature of the document, this could disclose sensitive information in APM Server error logs. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56016 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 7.1 High |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in WPTooling Image Mapper allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Image Mapper: from n/a through 0.2.5.3. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25923 | 1 Peepso | 1 Community By Peepso | 2025-07-12 | 5.3 Medium |
| Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability in PeepSo Community by PeepSo.This issue affects Community by PeepSo: from n/a through 6.2.7.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38741 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Noor-E-Alam Amazing Hover Effects allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Amazing Hover Effects: from n/a through 2.4.9. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27328 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in queeez WP-PostRatings Cheater allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WP-PostRatings Cheater: from n/a through 1.5. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13399 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 6.4 Medium |
| The Gosign – Posts Slider Block plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'posts-slider-block' block in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12458 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 6.4 Medium |
| The Smart PopUp Blaster plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's 'spb-button' shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.3 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47394 | 2 Eyecix, Wordpress | 2 Jobsearch, Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 7.1 High |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in eyecix JobSearch allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects JobSearch: from n/a through 2.5.9. | ||||
| CVE-2024-34388 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 7.5 High |
| Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Scribit GDPR Compliance.This issue affects GDPR Compliance: from n/a through 1.2.5. | ||||
| CVE-2024-22246 | 1 Vmware | 1 Sd-wan Edge | 2025-07-12 | 7.4 High |
| VMware SD-WAN Edge contains an unauthenticated command injection vulnerability potentially leading to remote code execution. A malicious actor with local access to the Edge Router UI during activation may be able to perform a command injection attack that could lead to full control of the router. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30982 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in zookatron MyBookProgress by Stormhill Media allows Stored XSS. This issue affects MyBookProgress by Stormhill Media: from n/a through 1.0.8. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31089 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 5.9 Medium |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Techblissonline.Com (Rajesh) Platinum SEO allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Platinum SEO: from n/a through 2.4.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2167 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 5.4 Medium |
| The Event post plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's 'events_list' shortcodes in all versions up to, and including, 5.9.9 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | ||||